3DMark 06 is out...

MAIN DISCUSSION FORUM - Games, Politics, Tech, Film, Music, Arts, Culture, Travel, teh Intarweb or whatever else is on your mind.

Moderator: enderzero

Post Reply
User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

3DMark 06 is out...

Post by R3C »

I haven't seen it yet, but I think I'll give it a whirl tonight.

User avatar
Beeeph
Hitching Post
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: BALLS COCK SHIT

Post by Beeeph »

I managed to squeeze out a whopping 3600 3dmarks and I came really really really close to hitting a frame per second during the CPU test. really.

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

Yeah I'll see if it will run on my aging box tonight.

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

ewww :toontears:

613 3DMarks
290 -- n/a -- 928 (.295/.468)
all settings default (unregistered)

btw - I also ran it with a single 1GB stick to test single channel vs dual channel perf. (I normally have 2 x 512). Results:
594 3D Marks
280 -- n/a -- 924 (.294/.465)

User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

Post by R3C »

I think that's because with an Intel chip the memory controller is in the chipset, whereas with AMD it's on chip. I get more performance with dual channel.

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

PC I just a-builta:

Athlon64 3200+ Venice
Radeon Xpress 200p board
1GB CVS DDR400
BFG 6800GT
Hitachi 250GB P-ATA

3DMark06 Results:
2421 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score 1061 (8.705fps/8.981fps)
HDR/SM3.0 Score 954 (8.450fpd/10.631fps)
CPU Score 793 (0.249/0.404) -lower than my P4 3200+

Wow, I didn't get to see the remade Dragon/Dirigible demo last time. Very cool.

User avatar
McNevin
Post Apocalyptic
Posts: 2802
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: Lat: 47.6062095, long: -122.3320708
Contact:

Post by McNevin »

Bench before upgrade:

Code: Select all

Video Adapter:	 nVIDIA GeForce 6800GT PCI-E Series (OC'ed 400MHz / 1005MHz)
CPU:	           AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
System Memory:	 2048 MB       (PC3200 DDR SDRAM)
CPU Clock:        2499.32 MHz
CPU FSB:           249.95 MHz   (original: 200 MHz, overclock: 25%)
Memory Timings:	2-3-3-6(1T)   (CL-RCD-RP-RAS)

3DMarks: 2681
SM2.0:   1153
HDR/SM3: 1026
CPU:      983    (0.309/0.500)
Image

User avatar
mistasparkle*
Hitching Post
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 1:31 am
Location: monkeyball

Post by mistasparkle* »

I put the new and improved sparkle*box through it's paces with 3dmark 06:

Code: Select all

CPU - AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+	
Internal Clock	2200 MHz
External Clock	200 MHz
Display Device	NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX	
Total Local Video Memory	256 MB
Driver Version	8.4.2.1	
VGA Memory Clock	1305 MHz 
VGA Core Clock	516 MHz <--- overclocked from 430 MHz
Total Physical Memory	1024 MB

3DMark Score	4750 3DMarks
SM2.0 Score	1975 
HDR/SM3.0 Score	1952 
CPU Score	1606 
Even hitting a mark as high as that, I can't really say the demo runs smooth. It never really creeps much past 30 in the fast parts, and the other parts are chop-tastic.

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

double dyamn...
that sheeeit is smokin.

User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

Post by R3C »

I have one of the slowest video cards on the forum. :D Interesting. I'm waiting for the G80 though. Must... remedy... situation... If I could just...

User avatar
McNevin
Post Apocalyptic
Posts: 2802
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: Lat: 47.6062095, long: -122.3320708
Contact:

Post by McNevin »

Post Upgraded Videocard (eVGA 7900GT CO Superlocked)
Had to re-overclock my PC, ok here it is:

Code: Select all

Video Adapter&#58;	nVIDIA GeForce 7900GT PCI-E Series &#40;SuperClocked 550MHz / 1580MHz&#41;
CPU&#58;			    AMD Athlon&#40;tm&#41; 64 Processor 3200+
System Memory&#58;	2048 MB       &#40;PC3200 DDR SDRAM&#41;
CPU Clock&#58;		 2499.32 MHz
CPU FSB&#58;		   249.95 MHz   &#40;original&#58; 200 MHz, overclock&#58; 25%&#41;
Memory Timings&#58;  2-3-3-6&#40;1T&#41;   &#40;CL-RCD-RP-RAS&#41;

3DMarks&#58; 4605
SM2.0&#58;   2190
HDR/SM3&#58; 2165
CPU&#58;      984	 &#40;0.309/0.501&#41;
P.S. Muhuhahahahah
Image

User avatar
mistasparkle*
Hitching Post
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 1:31 am
Location: monkeyball

Post by mistasparkle* »

Crysis is going to be the cats ass: http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=33004

User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

Post by R3C »

Pre x1900XT upgrade benchmarks

Code: Select all

Video Adapter&#58;	nVIDIA GeForce 7800GT PCI-E Series 
CPU&#58;			    AMD Athlon&#40;tm&#41; X2 Processor 3800+
System Memory&#58;	2048 MB       &#40;PC3200 DDR SDRAM&#41;
CPU Clock	     2399.54 MHz
CPU FSB&#58;		   239.94 MHz   &#40;original&#58; 200 MHz, overclock&#58; 20%&#41;


3DMarks&#58; 3611
SM2.0&#58;   1411
HDR/SM3&#58; 1379
CPU&#58;     1806    &#40;0.571/0.913&#41;

woohoo!!!111 one

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

The lower clocked X2 crushes the CPU score of the 3200. 3DMark06 must be highly optimized for dual cores.

User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

Post by R3C »

Code: Select all

Video Adapter&#58;   ATI Radeon x1900XT PCI-E Series
CPU&#58;             AMD Athlon&#40;tm&#41; X2 Processor 3800+
System Memory&#58;   2048 MB       &#40;PC3200 DDR SDRAM&#41;
CPU Clock        2399.54 MHz
CPU FSB&#58;         239.94 MHz   &#40;original&#58; 200 MHz, overclock&#58; 20%&#41;


3DMarks&#58; 5633
SM2.0&#58;   2206
HDR/SM3&#58; 2507
CPU&#58;     1806    &#40;0.571/0.913&#41; 

User avatar
R3C
Star Post
Posts: 6220
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Boot Sector

Post by R3C »

There 'tis.

User avatar
McNevin
Post Apocalyptic
Posts: 2802
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 12:39 pm
Location: Lat: 47.6062095, long: -122.3320708
Contact:

Post by McNevin »

Thats damn nice!
Image

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

User avatar
enderzero
Site Admin
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by enderzero »

Ahh - but this thread has scores.

I tested the following system pre-upgrade:

P4 Prescott 3.4GHz
MSI 865
2GB Corsair XMS
ATI X1300 256MB AGP (borrowed)
300GB 7200.9

3DMark 06 - Default settings (1280x1024) v1.0.2

Code: Select all

FINAL SCORE = 727 3DMARKS

SM2 = 252 &#40;1.689 / 2.516&#41;
HDR/SM3 = 280 &#40;2.571 / 3.025&#41;
CPU = 621 &#40;.199 / .310&#41;
These scores are pretty rotten - but I should mention the PC doesn't run for more than an hour without shutting down - so there may be soemthing wrong with it. The X1300 seems to score better than the 9800Pro tho - even if my same CPU is scoring lower than it used to.

Here are the 3DMark05 scores. Reference the Old Bench Thread for old scores. Notice these are way lower than they used to be.

3DMark 2005 - Default settings (1024x768) v1.2.0

Code: Select all

FINAL SCORE = 1657 3DMARKS

&#40;7.9 / 5.5 / 6.7&#41;
CPU = 3062 &#40;1.6 / 2.6&#41;
Damn glad to be getting rid of this bitch ass computer.

Post Reply