New HDD talk (SATA I v. SATA II) thread
Moderator: enderzero
- enderzero
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3442
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:40 am
- Location: Highland Park, Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Knew this day was coming soon:
Seagate plans to stop manufacturing IDE drives by year end
Seagate plans to stop manufacturing IDE drives by year end
Unless you count: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2093/176 ... 31c3f7.jpg
- N3ur0n0saurusl2exs0r!!!
- Hitching Post
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 10:47 pm
- Location: hidden
As of at or around the end of 2009...
7200
.10s suck ass...they are slow, noisy, and run too hot.
.11s are reasonable
.12s are the fastest, quietest, and release about the same heat as the Barracuda LPs that spin at 5900rpm
I almost don't have a preference between a Barracuda LP and a 7200.12 as they are about equal in speed...LPs are a little slower but generate a bit less heat...
These results are verified and certified through J3l2Ks0r! Laboratories Unlimited Ltd.
I saw the XTs a while back when I was sampling all the Barracudas... HOPEFULLY the XTs can actually begin to somewhat mildly approach the 3Gb/s SATA transfer rate as none of the ones above even come close. I think 6Gb/s is a horribly overestimated theoretical limit that the drives won't come near by several orders of magnitude.
.10s suck ass...they are slow, noisy, and run too hot.
.11s are reasonable
.12s are the fastest, quietest, and release about the same heat as the Barracuda LPs that spin at 5900rpm
I almost don't have a preference between a Barracuda LP and a 7200.12 as they are about equal in speed...LPs are a little slower but generate a bit less heat...
These results are verified and certified through J3l2Ks0r! Laboratories Unlimited Ltd.
I saw the XTs a while back when I was sampling all the Barracudas... HOPEFULLY the XTs can actually begin to somewhat mildly approach the 3Gb/s SATA transfer rate as none of the ones above even come close. I think 6Gb/s is a horribly overestimated theoretical limit that the drives won't come near by several orders of magnitude.
- N3ur0n0saurusl2exs0r!!!
- Hitching Post
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 10:47 pm
- Location: hidden
Ah...according to the Seagate's XT datasheet they aren't that much faster...can supply 138 MB/s sustained transfer rate...I was getting between 90-110MB/s on the 7200.12
Seagate rates 7200.12s at 125MB/s
so we are only talking about an increase of 13MB/s...pretty ridiculous, but not surprising, considering the drive is going from 300Gb/s to 600Gb/s...
So going by an increase of 13MB/s per 300Gb/s of "max transfer rate" the advertised max transfer rate would have to be at 4500Gb/s to get 307MB/s and 11,400GB/s to get 600MB/s
Seagate rates 7200.12s at 125MB/s
so we are only talking about an increase of 13MB/s...pretty ridiculous, but not surprising, considering the drive is going from 300Gb/s to 600Gb/s...
So going by an increase of 13MB/s per 300Gb/s of "max transfer rate" the advertised max transfer rate would have to be at 4500Gb/s to get 307MB/s and 11,400GB/s to get 600MB/s
- N3ur0n0saurusl2exs0r!!!
- Hitching Post
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 10:47 pm
- Location: hidden